Monday, September 01, 2008

Steve Rosenbaum, MAGNIFY.net and MTV UNFILTERED creator: Mr. Media Interview

Bookmark and Share
We’re going to do something a little different on Mr. Media today – instead of being a half-wit know-it-all, I’m going to try to learn something practical from my guest.

Joining me is Steve Rosenbaum, who developed, created and produced the groundbreaking “MTV Unfiltered” program in 1993. Shot entirely by viewers, UNfiltered marked the first fully user-created program in television history and was the model used by Al Gore for CURRENT.TV. Along the way networks such as CBS, A&E, and HBO all counted on Rosenbaum to help them explore and deploy user-generated video in programming.

Today, Rosenbaum is behind a new venture, Magnify.net, which uses video in still new ways. If you’re a blogger, podcaster or web site producer, I think you’ll find this program particularly interesting – and practical, as Steve walks me through posting video content on an actual web site.

You can LISTEN to this Mr. Media interview with MAGNIFY.net founder STEVE ROSENBAUM by clicking the BlogTalkRadio.com audio player below!

Open in your default player

Detach into a separate window




[Get Copyright Permissions]Copyright 2008 Bob Andelman. Click here for copyright permissions!




Labels: , , , , , ,

Thursday, May 08, 2008

Daniel Pink, THE ADVENTURES OF JOHNNY BUNKO, FREE AGENT NATION author: Mr. Media Audio Interview

Bookmark and Share
MangaImage via WikipediaDaniel Pink has made a career of being first on business themes over the last seven years, ever since publication of Free Agent Nation in May 2001. His theory then? That more of us will be working for ourselves in the future.

Well, it’s now the future, so I’ll ask him whether that came true.

He also wrote A Whole New Mind, about the the move from the Information Age to the Conceptual Age.

But Dan’s newest book may be his greatest leap yet: a manga-style graphic novel titled The Adventures of Johnny Bunko: The Last Career Guide You’ll Ever Need. For my not-so-Japanese-media-savvy friends, what the Japanese call manga, Americans call comic books.

Click on the BlogTalkRadio Audio Player to listen to this interview!

open separate window














© 2008 by Bob Andelman. All rights reserved.
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, December 31, 2007

John Amato "CrooksandLiars.com" political blogger: Mr. Media Interview, Part 2

Bookmark and Share
(RETURN TO PART 1)

BOB ANDELMAN/Mr. MEDIA: Well, John, let me ask you this. A lot of the blogs, they simply reprint what’s appeared in the mainstream press, or they just link to other things, but one of the things that I think that’s happened with your site is, you’ve actually done some of your own original reporting, and you’ve gotten interviews, right?

JOHN AMATO: Yes.

ANDELMAN: How did that start, and how have you come along with that?

AMATO: It’s a lot of fun. I mean, there are some bloggers that just offer opinions, and they are quite comfortable, and it’s necessary, and it’s important. Some people will just analyze news or talk about candidates and policy and the direction of different parties, whether they’re Democrats or Republicans. I like to do reporting, and I get a kick out of making phone calls and then asking questions. I have done that a bunch of times, and people are responsive on the other end because people know CrooksandLiars, so they understand that my site is in their own words, I guess you’d say. It’s a credible site because it is so visible, which really shouldn’t matter even if I was a smaller blogger, but I love doing interviews. I’ve interviewed directors, I’ve interviewed musicians, and I’ve interviewed a lot of politicians and authors of books.


I try to bring as much as I can to the site and to my readers, and I try to bring part of my own personality to the site. It’s just not strictly political analysis or political content. I like people to know what music I like. I like people to know what books I’m reading. I like people to know what TV shows I’m watching. I think that the more they know about me, the more they can put things in context, and then in return, the readers also give back to me. I mean, I posted about a jazz legend, Milt Hinton, that I studied with in Hunter College, and I just told that this man was a giant, and I must have gotten fifteen emails from people that had been touched by Milt Hinton. There’s a sharing of ideas.

The original reporting and the interviews, it just gives my readers more content, more reasons to come back, more reasons to say that these guys are working hard. This is what we want people to do. We don’t want them to be lazy. We don’t want them to get their facts wrong. We want them to be out there and tearing up the terrain trying to break new ground, trying to get to stories that the mainstream media will forget about.

Since I’ve had medical issues, I’ve had some doctors that I have not liked, and so do you remember when Rush Limbaugh got busted for having the little blue pills and they weren’t in his name? Well, I called the California Medical Board, and then I called the Florida Medical Board. And it is illegal for somebody to put a prescription in one person’s name and then give that prescription to somebody else. I wasn’t going after Rush Limbaugh having these blue pills, I was going after the doctors because that was illegal. Rush Limbaugh should get prescriptions in his own name. That’s just a little story, and I got the D.A. on the phone down in Florida, and he was pretty embarrassed that they had to kick it to another county. But it raised awareness to the fact that doctors are not allowed to use the prescription pad like they were doing for Rush Limbaugh. Doesn’t happen in Los Angeles.

ANDELMAN: John, you mention Limbaugh, and I wanted to ask you something relative to Limbaugh. Starting with Keith Olberman, changing the subject a little bit, but as Olberman has caught on and attracted a bigger audience, some people think he’s become nothing more than a lefty Limbaugh. How do you feel about that?






AMATO: I don’t agree, and there are a lot of different reasons. I think that Olberman finally took the track of, which, if there were Democrats in office and they put us in a war that was based on, let’s call them what they are – lies -- and they decided to be able to tap phones, want to read our emails, they decided to torture people, they decided to rendition people, send them to countries where they will be tortured, to have Abu Ghraib, the list goes on and on, to have an Attorney General that’s nothing more than the President’s best buddy, he would be doing the same thing if it was a lefty in office. There has been so much corruption and, I believe, incompetence in this administration that he decided to become more of an opinion-maker, and he decided just to let it hang out, and I know the right doesn’t like him too much, because now his popularity, he’s the number one show on MSNBC, but he does not distort. Again, you can disagree with him, just go and fact-check him. I won’t even say he’s left-wing, that’s up to him to tell you, but how many people on AM radio or on cable news do we have that are liberals? You can’t name any. I mean, let’s not even talk about Fox. MSNBC after the elections, who was their first hire? Tucker Carlson, a guy that got kicked off of CNN. So it’s good to have a voice out there that is critical of the administration, and I doubt, if there isn’t a swapping of administration in 2008, that he will suddenly give them a pass. I mean, I know most bloggers on the left will not sit by idly if a Democrat is in power, and in 2010 says, “We think we have intelligence, and we need to invade Turkey.” That’s not going to fly.

ANDELMAN: Have you reached the point of picking a candidate to support for 2008?

AMATO: No, I haven’t.
What I usually concentrate on is what I believe to be smears or narratives that are untrue. Right now, I’m just letting all the candidates speak. My readers are smart enough to know who they want. If I endorse somebody, I don’t know if it’s going to sway anybody, but I kind of want to stay out of that. I want to just let the candidates duke it out.
I will post when Barack Obama is on Leno, and he’s funny, and if Hillary’s here, or if John Edwards is there, or Richardson or whoever else is going, and I’ll give them all space if it’s warranted. I’m my own guy, so I post what I think is relevant to people, what I think is funny, what is entertaining, or what is critical of, let’s say, a vote on Iraq or a vote on war or on the budget or this bankruptcy bill. We can go into each vote on and on, so right now, I’m staying out of picking somebody in the primary. We’ll see what happens as we get closer, but I’m probably not going to endorse anybody. My readers are smart enough to make up their own minds.

ANDELMAN: The campaigns have obviously gotten very Internet-savvy. They’re raising a lot of money that way. Have any of the campaigns reached out to you, either to give you news items or to try to get your support?

AMATO: See, this is what they’re doing very smartly. They’ve reached out to certain different types of bloggers that know that you can’t…. to try to sway a blogger, if he has any self-decency or dignity, you just can’t do it. And so there’s … he’s actually a friend of mine, well, we’ve become friends through the Internet, but his name is Peter Daou, and he runs the Internet for Hillary Clinton’s campaign. We used to do a lot of little email chats here and there. He’s off the list now, because he’s now not a blogger any more, he’s a political operative, so you know, they are being very smart, and they know that they cannot curry favor with us, but they all, from all candidates, they send out press releases, they send out, well, “This is Barak’s position,” or “This is John Edwards’ position on this,” let’s say it’s stem cells. Well, this is Hillary or Bill Richardson or Joe Biden or even Chris Dodd's people, they make information available. They tell us their Web site set-up, and if they want to make a statement…. You know, a bunch of people made a statement about Imus, John Kerry, they’re all welcome to, but it doesn’t mean we will use anything.

ANDELMAN: Okay. Are there any Democrats that you don’t support?

AMATO: As far as in what fashion, for the Presidency?

ANDELMAN: In any fashion, at any national level.

AMATO: Well, there’s a lot of Democrats that I’m not thrilled with. I won’t go through all of them. A bunch of them are in the House, and they are these so-called blue dog Democrats. There is a Web site called I think ProgressivePunch.com or .org, and you can see every vote that a House member and a Senator has taken, so you can track their record. No more is it a secret. They’re like, “You’ve elected these people, what are they doing?” You can actually see their voting records, and the people who want to continue funding the war endlessly or who are voting with Republicans more than Democrats on key issues, those are people that I won’t support, and we let them know. If you read my blog, you will see occasionally where I’ll see Stenny Hoyer, who’s now the new Majority Leader, and he was not very clear the other day on his stance on the Iraq war and what he felt our next move was, so I will say, “I didn’t get that, Stenny Hoyer.”






ANDELMAN: Are there any Republicans in national office that you admire or support?

AMATO: (Sighs.) Let’s see. You know, I’ve been working so hard with dealing with the corruption with this administration. If you’ve noticed, everything’s changed since 2006, and for whatever reason, the Republican party decided to give Bush a rubber stamp through all these years.
John McCain was supposed to be this maverick, and then he let Bush kiss him on the head during the 2004 election where Bush’s team spread rumors that he was fathering illegitimate black babies, and I couldn’t understand, how could a man be smeared like that and then turn around and say, “Well, you know, that’s the way it goes.”
I don’t know. I mean, I believe in forgiveness, but that’s just almost criminal in my mind, and then when you had John Warner, who seems to be very respectable, when they got together with this military commissions act and now allow torture and started taking away the rights of counsel to prisoners? To me that’s a violation of the Constitution and everything that’s American. Behind the scenes, they yell a lot. Chuck Hagel screams a lot about how out of touch Dick Cheney is, and he has actually, he did vote on the new budget with the Democrats. But other than that, if you look at their voting records, that’s where you’ll see the sound and the words and the fury on TV when they’re yelling back and forth, you just have to wait when they place their votes. And that’s why the term rubber stamp Republican came out because there hasn’t been, now that the Democrats have come in, there is some oversight, but my God! You’ve heard the story, $9 billion, if you saw the pictures of that much money in suitcases, missing. How can there not be any hearing to find out what happened to $9 billion? So I’ve been very disappointed with this crop.

A right-wing blogger that I like, this guy John Cole from West Virginia, and he blogs on BalloonJuice. It got to the point, he used to be what I would consider a Bush cultist, which was just support him because he’s the President, no matter what he’s doing or saying. And finally the Republican party broke him, and it was interesting, because he’s a staunch conservative, but he wanted them all kicked out in the 2006 election, because he believes that the party has been corrupted. So it’s pretty interesting. True conservatives, true people that are true to their principles have not been happy with many from the Republican Party.

ANDELMAN: I have one last question: many people find that their political views become more conservative as they get older. Are you seeing any sign of that within your own beliefs?

AMATO: How do you define “conservative” in that context? What is the center? Do you know what I mean? Has anybody defined what the center is? I believe that we all through our experiences in life, we all come to decisions and conclusions which we are comfortable with morally, what we think is the right thing to do. So that’s how I’ve developed my convictions, so they are not changing, they’re only getting stronger since I’ve been involved with blogging and in the political process. So I don’t believe that that’s the case, but then again, you need to define what conservative means or what the middle means or the left or the right. You have what I consider the extreme Christian right, and on my site, I write a lot about the extreme Christians. I’m a Catholic, and my sister is a born-again Christian, but I don’t knock the people. I knock their leaders because there is so much money being made. I mean, to not want to have stem cell research to me is insane, or to stop the Plan B pill. For what reason? This will save… They are against abortion, and here’s a pill that’s an incredible pill so that people won’t have to make that choice, and they are against that. We have to define really what is the center? I mean, there are right wing bloggers that try to say they’re center-right as a way to confuse journalists and confuse listeners. We can all disagree on different issues and maybe go not so much as far here as there, but again, what does that mean, the middle? That’s what I want somebody to explain to me.

© 2007 by Bob Andelman. All rights reserved.



Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Seth Bauer, "National Geographic's The Green Guide" editor: The Mr. Media Interview, Pt. 1

Bookmark and Share

The first cool thing you need to know about National Geographic’s The Green Guide newsletter is that you can download an electronic edition of the latest issue for $2.50 right now or spend $3.50, and they’ll mail you one in about two weeks. I like it already.

The Green Guide is truly a magazine of the moment. Whether you believe in global warming, as Al Gore does, or believe it’s nothing more than liberal strategery, as the President does, the environment is a hot topic.

I can’t believe I just said that.

Joining me today is Seth Bauer, editorial director of The Green Guide and thegreenguide.com.

Launched in 1994 and acquired by National Geographic in 2007, The Green Guide is a bimonthly newsletter and comprehensive Web site for consumers interested in a green lifestyle.

Over the past 20 years, Bauer has served as editor-in-chief for publications such as Body & Soul and Walking magazines. He’s also the co-author of the 90 Day Fitness Walking Program and has been published in The New York Times, Outside, and American Health. He is also – and this is very interesting to me – an Olympic medal winner and a world champion in rowing.

DOWNLOAD THE MP3; LISTEN HERE.

ALSO AVAILABLE AS A PODCAST ON iTUNES and ODEO.



Bob Andelman/Mr. Media: Seth, tell me about the downloadable edition of The Green Guide versus the dead trees edition. Which is more widely read?

Bauer: Well, I have to admit the dead trees edition is more widely read, although honestly, the most widely read piece of The Green Guide is a completely free email newsletter that we send out once a week called The Green Guide To Go, and that’s where our biggest audience is, and a lot of people just go straight from there to our Web site. But we do have a traditional print version and its PDF counterpart.

Andelman: Now I have to admit, I’m a bit of a hypocrite here. I love the idea of downloadable books and magazines, but I haven’t read that many of them. It never seems a quite convenient format for where you are at the time, although I will also say that I did find one that seemed to fit perfectly. It was Blogger & Podcaster magazine, of all things. But which edition are you guys pushing? Which are you hoping to see grow the most?

Bauer: Oh, we’d love to see the electronic version grow. It’s a little bit of a trade-off in some areas, because our content is as practical as we can possibly make it, and so we literally like it when people bring The Green Guide with them grocery shopping, and we have the supplemental shopping list often, called Smart Shopper’s Guide, that we offer also for download. But yeah, sure, we’d love to see people save the paper, and over time, we are imagining that there will be easier and easier electronic forms of communication that will probably take care of the need for paper altogether.













Andelman: I guess people would be able to take it on their iPhone.

Bauer: They’re getting there. We have our first phone application available. It’s a fish shopper’s guide, so if you’re in the grocery store and you can’t remember which kind of fish are more sustainable than others, you can dial us up.

Andelman: Well, let’s go ahead and tell people. What would they dial up? Do you know offhand?

Bauer: You know, I will have to get that for you as we talk.

Andelman: Okay. Or we can post that later as a link. That’s not a problem.

Bauer: Yeah, why don’t we do that?

Andelman: Now, do you consider your position as editor of The Green Guide to be as much political as environmental soapbox?

Bauer: No, not any more, and that’s one of the nice things about it. As I see it, there have been sort of three fairly distinct generations of environmental activism, and the first is where it all began, which was really about conservation. At the turn of the century – in the Teddy Roosevelt era – as people realized exactly how much of the planet humans were starting to occupy, they realized they better keep some sections of it as pristine as possible. There was a long, 50-year environmental movement built, really, around the notion of conservation. And then in the ’60s and ’70s – you could call it the Rachel Carson era – people realized the level of industrial pollutants that there were in the environment and what it was doing to nature in every form. There began to be a political movement built around regulation, and testing, a very scientific movement. And then now, it’s what I would consider a third generation, and this is really about simply adopting smarter strategies for living, because people accept now the scientific argument, they accept that they need to do something, they accept that – at some levels of the Administration – the notion that global warming is an issue potentially for all humanity and that their small contributions are important to make a difference. And so they just want to know what to do, what are the simple steps they can take. That’s really where The Green Guide lives.












Andelman: My sense of what you said, then, is that you do not consider yourself as an activist editor, then, or do you?

Bauer: No. I would call it more action than activist.

Andelman: You mentioned the Administration and global warming, and I kind of wondered, are you more amused or annoyed by people who doubt the science of global warming?

Bauer: Well, you know, I think that any scientific inquiry is potentially very healthy. I have no issue with it whatsoever, but the fundamental notion of science is that you look evidence very squarely in the face and you accept the logical conclusion that is drawn from that evidence. And to me, the people who are in the total global warming denier camp are not looking the evidence very squarely in the face.

Andelman: What do you believe? Do you believe that there is global warming as some people have described it?

Bauer: Yeah. I wouldn’t want to call it a matter of belief. I think that there is clear evidence that there is global warming, and I think there is very, very important evidence that a lot of it is human-caused, is caused by the way we are building our society and our culture and our energy use and that many of the decisions that brought us to this point were essentially made without any understanding, knowledge, suspicion of global warming, and if we had had that knowledge, we probably would have made different decisions, and we are still perfectly capable of doing so.

Andelman: So Seth, you believe in global warming. The next thing you are going to tell me is you believe in evolution, too.

Bauer: Oh, I’m not going down that road.

Andelman: Oh, God. Can someone who does not believe in global warming, can they nonetheless be a participant in a magazine like The Green Guide ?






Bauer: Oh, of course, because you know, you can break it down to say, here I am fighting global warming, or you can break it down to say, here I am saving money, taking better care of my family, taking better care of my home and my property. If you want to look at going green at its most sort of fundamental nature, that’s where you get to.

Andelman: I’m an old guy. I’ve got a family, I’ve got a house, and I like to think in terms that we recycle things. But I still have the sense that most people may have that the typical reader for this is a college student or someone wearing the Stevie Nicks flowing gowns or the long hair and the little round sunglasses. National Geographic, I assume, would not have spent the money on a magazine that was going to appeal that narrowly, but how do you make it broad?

Bauer: You know, I don’t think you have to force it any more, and that fits with this notion of environmentalism moving past the political, and it’s part of everybody’s consciousness now. You think about it. It’s a big step for National Geographic, even with the distinction between action and activism, it’s a big step for National Geographic to suggest action, that traditionally for 120 years or so National Geographic has been about inspiration and informing people and educating people, often about the environment, and it has always just kind of come to the brink of suggesting action and left that piece of it to other information sources and organizations. And now, it is universal enough a need and, frankly, apolitical enough that National Geographic is happy to be offering this kind of information.

Andelman: What resources, if any, does the magazine get from the Geographic. Geographic obviously has its own series of geographic magazines. This is a little different. Are there resources that you can draw on there?












Bauer: Yeah, we get resources every which way. From scientific… There are explorers and residents at National Geographic who are working right in this area, but more importantly from my perspective is it allows me as an editor to think absolutely globally. And my take is that different people learn and think and are spurred to action in different ways. Different kinds of information motivate them. Some people are more visual, some people are more aural; some people are more readers. Some people are magazine readers; some people are book readers. There are lots of ways that people like to get their information, and very often, they don’t cross boundaries. People who primarily get their information from TV primarily don’t get their information from reading, and so being part of an absolute multi-media giant like National Geographic lets The Green Guide think about getting its information out every which way. And to me, that’s what allows us to think that this is going to be big now, that there are a lot of people we are going to be able to reach in a lot of forms.


CLICK HERE TO KEEP READING!

©2007 by Bob Andelman. All rights reserved.



Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Seth Bauer, "National Geographic's The Green Guide" editor: The Mr. Media Interview, Pt. 2

Bookmark and Share

(RETURN TO PART 1)

Bob Andelman: Will The Green Guide be promoted in National Geographic publications?

Seth Bauer: Sure will. Yep. That is on the drawing board. There’s a book in the works. We are working with a television group on some things. There are radio pieces in the works. We are really, and you know, we are housed within “digital media,” so we’re housed as a multi-media platform.

Andelman: Now, you came on since the acquisition, as I understand.

Bauer: That’s right. I’m brand new.












Andelman: How has the newsletter changed already, and how will it change in the coming, let’s say, twelve months?

Bauer: I have to answer that that is still in the works. We are looking at the best, broadest way to deliver our information in any platform, including print, and we are looking at a couple of options on the print side, but we haven’t made any decisions, yet.

Andelman: Let me ask you this: what kind of buttons can you push with your readers, and what buttons do you think you have to stay clear of or tread carefully upon?

Bauer: It kind of goes back to what I was saying earlier about staying practical and letting people see and understand all of the benefits that they get from being green, and they are personal benefits, they are financial benefits, they are altruistic rewards, they are being part of a community. The benefits come every which way, and those are the buttons that we push, staying on the practical end. I have a friend, Jeffrey Hollender, who is the founder of Seventh Generation, which makes non-toxic household products, primarily cleaning products, and Jeffrey tells a story of struggling for years to sell his products by saying, buy my household cleaners and save the planet, and the business did moderately well; it grew kind of slowly. And then six, eight years ago, they started saying, buy our household cleaners and save your family, and business took off.

Andelman: It’s the marketing.

Bauer: It’s really where the message is. Let’s think about what your real reward is here. Yes, it’s important to do a little piece of saving the planet, but it’s also important to not have your pets lying outside in, I happen to know you’re a dog owner, not have your pets lying outside in chemical fertilizers, not having your children exposed to chlorine fumes or vinyl off-gassing or formaldehyde off-gassing. You know, if you stop and think about, ask yourself the question, do I really need to do this this way, many times the answer is no, that there’s a healthier way, and that’s really what The Green Guide talks about.

Andelman: Now you’re freaking me out a little bit, Seth, because the yard was just sprayed today, and the kids are out in the backyard in the chlorinated pool. Oh, God, 10 demerits for me from The Green Guide. Before you took this job, how green was your life, and how has your own life changed or will it change since you’ve taken the job?












Bauer: The honest answer is when I was the editor of Body & Soul magazine, I became very interested in these issues, and these were a small piece of what we wrote about there. I took the easy way, and I don’t regret it at all. All those little, small things that you hear about, that every newspaper that runs an article about going green talks about, changing your light bulbs to compact fluorescents, drying some of your laundry out on a rack rather than all in your dryer. All those little things, going organic with your lawn care, those are all of the things that I did My family, I have a wife and an only child, a high-school age son, and we started about four or five years ago, and it all just felt perfectly comfortable. We never felt like we were sacrificing. We never felt like we were making a major investment at the expense of something else. We were just improving the way we do things. We are in the process now of doing some construction on our kitchen, and we didn’t think twice about keeping as much of the existing structure as possible and essentially recycling existing parts of the house or using non-fiberglass-based insulation. All these things at any given time are relatively small decisions, and you add them together, and you have a green lifestyle.

Andelman: This must have been very helpful in the job interview.

Bauer: Yes. No doubt about that. I was well down this road when I went to talk to Wendy Gordon at The Green Guide .

Andelman: You said something else I thought was very interesting. You said that these are all little decisions as you go down the path. It actually sounds a lot like dieting, that you make a good decision every day or at every meal. That’s when you make the decision. As it comes along, you make the decision, well, am I going to eat well at this meal? Well, am I going to buy the right product for the house today? That kind of thing.

Bauer: That’s right. And the trick to being a success at it, like dieting, is not to dwell on what you’re giving up but to really understand and enjoy what you are choosing.

Andelman: What makes a good story for The Green Guide and at the same time, what doesn’t?

Bauer: Practical application makes a good story, things that people can really implement to understand and understand the positive impact of. It can be a huge range of things, from electronics to gardening to what happens at work to family choices to food choices. It’s really a combination of purchases, so your consumer behavior and practices, and any of that range can make for a great Green Guide story.












Andelman: So there’s more to it than rechargeable batteries, paper versus plastic, bottled water?

Bauer: No, that’s not it.

Andelman: Oh, okay, well, that’s what I thought. Those three and just write about them differently every month.

Bauer: Yeah.

Andelman: Must drive your writers crazy. I guess you probably would tell me that the topic of green is so vast as to be endless.

Bauer: Yeah, and actually, it’s more that like dieting, you think that dieting is a fairly obvious topic, and you discover that there are different things that work for different people and that there are different interests and fads and experiments and all kinds of things that come along. And then in the green world, there’s also a lot of new ideas on the drawing board at any given time and new products and new availability all the time nowadays.

Andelman: There was a couple weeks ahead of when we are doing this interview, there was the Live Earth concerts, and a lot of the talk there was about green and recycling and things, but it seemed like a good day of music. There was a lot of celebrity posing and speechmaking, but a day later, it seemed like it was business as usual. Did any of that have any impact on what you’re doing?






Bauer: Yes -- to the extent that a piece of any motivation to change or to try new things requires inspiration. Something like Live Earth is all about inspiration, and it’s not like the comments that the musicians make are going to change people’s lives, but they are going to change people’s awareness, and then the next time they see information on Mr. Media from The Green Guide, they are going to scratch their heads, and it’s going to be another piece of, “Oh yeah, I should be thinking about that. Oh yeah, I could do things a little differently.” So I don’t think that they want to imitate Bono necessarily, but I think that he brings an awareness or any of these musicians brings an awareness to people who, you know, just another little puzzle piece in their overall consciousness.

Andelman: Do celebrities have any place in The Green Guide ?

Bauer: We have had some… Actually, a celebrity was the founder of The Green Guide. The Green Guide was founded under the auspices of the Natural Resources Defense Council, by Wendy Gordon, who is still our General Manager, and Meryl Streep.

Andelman: Really?

Bauer: Yep. And Meryl Streep was involved in the NRDC, and she was interested, and she and Wendy, I think, both became moms around the same and started talking about raising children in a less toxic environment and turned that idea into a newsletter that became The Green Guide .

Andelman: I did not know that. That’s very interesting. And will there be coverage of, will you go to Dave Matthews’ home and write about how he composts or things like that?












Bauer: Only if he does it really practically. I mean, it’s the same, our fundamental method stays the same, which is, we want information that people can employ themselves, and if they think that at Dave Matthews’ house or Oprah’s house or whatever, there are 20 staff people helping to manage the composting and therefore it’s something that he can do but they can’t, there’s no point in our presenting it that way. On the other hand, if we think more people are going to read The Green Guide because it has Dave Matthews’ name in it somewhere, yeah, we may well invite Dave to be a guest editor. And what we do with our guest editors is we ask them a little bit about their own practices, and then we ask them what really their pet issues are, and then we go ahead and do our own independent stories about those pet issues.

Andelman: How will you grow this publication and bring it out of the margins? I mean, the name alone, I hate to go back to this, but it does sound a little like something found on the freebie rack at the neighborhood health food store.

Bauer: Right. Well, thanks to attaching the name National Geographic to it, we have a lot more gravitas than we had a few months ago, and we also have many, many more avenues for marketing and exposure. So we see lots of ways to grow it, from print versions at retail, you may see a newsstand version of The Green Guide in magazine form at some point, to really expanded marketing efforts on the Web. And that is already happening and is really in many ways our primary focus.

Andelman: How important is advertising?

Bauer: Advertising is always important in some form. There is at National Geographic very careful separation of church and state, and so my mandate is to understand that advertising is important and then not to think about it any further than that.

Andelman: Well, the reason I asked is I imagine that that’s one thing that Geographic does not necessarily bring to the table is that it doesn’t have that consumer advertising that like Body & Soul probably had or Walking. It’s a different type of thing, so I wondered if they would be helpful for that or how much you rely on advertising revenues, I guess, versus subscription revenue.

Bauer: Well, The Green Guide as a newsletter has primarily been funded by subscriptions, but as we grow and change in some other avenues, advertising will certainly come into play.

Andelman: And what’s next? I mean, will there be social networking through your Web site? That would seem like a logical progression.

Bauer: You know, our very next steps are to do some blogging. We have some really interesting people lined up to be bloggers for The Green Guide and in three categories. One is sort of big thinkers, and we’ve talked about names you would talk to, people with names you would recognize about blogging on the site. They would talk about really putting what’s happening in the green world into some bigger economic or global perspective. And then we have our own staff which has started blogging, and the staff is really reacting to the news of the day, so when something comes out in the news about new regulations for organic food standards or new products coming out on the market or an energy company making a commitment to using a certain amount of wind power, we’re in a position to put that in perspective for our readers. And then the third group of bloggers are people you could think of as modern diarists, people who are like you. You might have the fertilizer out on the lawn and the kids out in the chlorinated pool, but you’re thinking about taking a couple of steps toward going green. And we have several very good, very funny, very engaging writers lined up to tell us about their experiences and what’s working and what’s not working and what their neighbors are saying and what their mom says and how their kids react and sort of what it’s like as they move in what we would hope to be a positive direction.

Andelman: Finally, Seth, you won an Olympic medal for rowing.

Bauer: It’s true.

Andelman: What year was that, and then what I really want to know is, is there a day that goes by that you don’t think about that experience?

Bauer: The year was 1988. The Olympics were in Seoul, South Korea, that year, and probably there is no day that goes by. It’s partly because I am still so attached to my teammates from the Olympics, I don’t think there’s a day that goes by where I don’t get email from one of them, so it has to be top of mind. But it was a pretty amazing experience and especially for me. I was a coxswain on the rowing team, and coxswains, if you know anything about rowing, are basically the little people who steer the boat and give the commands, and so I’m 5’ 6”, and I raced at 50 kilos, which was 110 pounds, which I could not do any more, and my teammates are all 6’ 5” and above and 220 and pretty much the finest athletes in the world, so it made for a great team experience.

© 2007 by Bob Andelman. All rights reserved.



Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Friday, May 04, 2007

John Amato "CrooksandLiars.com" political blogger: Mr. Media Interview

Bookmark and Share

It’s not just this generation.

Politics has always been dirty, nasty, bare-knuckle affairs. In the American two-party system, one side always blames the other for whatever ails the country.

The new twist in the 21st Century is the emergence of political Web sites and political blogs in particular. Anyone with a point of view can get a free blog from blogger.com or wordpress.com and be online telling the world what they think about anything, anywhere in about ten minutes or less.

Some of these new voices are surprisingly thoughtful, literate, and inspiring. Some are just idiots with cyber-megaphones. Some are on the right, some are on the left, but there is no doubt that the best of them and some who are just louder than the others will wield unprecedented influence going into the 2008 Presidential primaries and election cycle.

One of the rising stars of the genre is John Amato, agent provocateur of the best-named blog of the bunch, CrooksandLiars.com.

BOB ANDELMAN/Mr. MEDIA: John, you are a professional musician by trade. What prompts a man like yourself to go public with his politics?

AMATO: Well, you know, a couple of reasons. First of all, politics obviously influences everybody’s lives, and I think at some time in each of our lives, we have taken a look and seen who is running for President, even if we never bother with politics, and I was that type of person, which would sort of be on the periphery, you know, read what I can, and it was something that interested me. But being a professional musician, obviously, I practice for six hours a day and go on the road and travel and still keep abreast of things. But I got injured.
I was touring with Duran Duran, and a doctor crippled me. We won’t get into what he did, and I was unable to perform. I was home disabled, and that’s when I started to really follow the blogs because I was able to read, and I decided, you know, I want my voice to be heard, even if nobody reads it, because I felt that things in this country were in the wrong direction.
If for nothing else, I would be able to express myself, and that’s all I wanted to really do at that time.

ANDELMAN: Was there a particular incident, a political incident that set you off?

AMATO: Well, I would say initially there were two things. Obviously, the Iraq war was one that I felt was a dishonest war. I felt that it was something that we should have never done, so that got my blood boiling. And as a touring musician, this might be funny to some, but when people started to protest the Dixie Chicks -- and when I heard that they were burning their records and kicking them off the radio -- I was playing at the time. It caused me to pause and say, “Wait a second.” I mean, before, I grew up in the 1970s where protest and music were part of the culture. Music told The Man, you know, “Get out of here. We’re not taking it.” Music was the instrument. It sort of obviously changed society, and there was a big break in the 1960s and 1970s, so when I heard that people were attacking the Dixie Chicks just because they said something negative against President Bush, I really realized that there was something very wrong with the country.


ANDELMAN: Did you ever imagine a New York boy like you would be supporting a bunch of Southern chicks like them?

AMATO: I never did. I like Patsy Cline. I can’t tell you that I’ve been a big country fan, but some of the greats I enjoy, some of the old Johnny Cash and Merle Haggard, but it was just interesting. That story just stuck with me, obviously a musician playing, and I just could not understand. And I realized that there were people really organizing to do this, and this is America! We talk against power. It doesn’t matter if it’s a Democratic nominee in the White House, if it’s a Republican, we all question or at least say, “What is going on? Why are they doing this?” And to take us into a war by choice would seem that a lot of people might disagree on that, and for a country and a people just attack their music was to me insane.

ANDELMAN: Was this the first overt political act of your life?

AMATO: I would say yes as far as starting the blog. It’s funny. In the 2000 election, I was really following it. I saw some of the debates. I play sax and flute. I guess people think, you know, it looks pretty easy, but if you are a professional or you take it very seriously, your life is like anything, is wrapped into it. And I would play all day, all night, listen, compose, feel really wrapped up into that. I did follow the 2000 election, and that was another sign -- when the Supreme Court voted George Bush into power. That was another instance that I said, something’s wrong with the country. State’s rights issue, I couldn’t understand what this really weird rule that the Republicans were putting forth, why they should stop the count. Even if you don’t dig into the weeds of the law like the lawyers do, I couldn’t understand why they just wouldn’t recount and get it over with. I mean, and that would have been that. But it was so political in my mind at that time that, again, it raises red flags. And you know, most average Americans, let’s face it, they are working hard. They have kids to feed, college books or high school books, pens, pencils, food, and how much time does a family making two salaries under $100,000 have to really be invested in what our politicians are doing? They have to pay their rent, so it was another eye-opener for me.





















ANDELMAN: As a fairly regular reader of crooksandliars.com, I think, I mean, my sense is that you are a Democrat, but I don’t want to put words in your mouth. Is that a safe assumption?

AMATO: Yeah. You know, it’s funny, the power of the media is such that growing up as a child, you would watch on TV, and you didn’t even know about politics. I’m big into sports, so it was like, who looks cooler, or what team, so as I got older, I was a registered Independent because I didn’t really want to be tied down to one person or one party at the time. So it was only in 2000 when I looked at who should run the country after Clinton, should it be Gore or Bush, and I realized that, well, we have a man that has already been in the White House for eight years, the country has been very prosperous, and I guess the guy who basically failed at every business and was bailed out by his family and was just a governor in Texas, I just couldn’t see myself supporting George Bush in the 2000 election, and I just decided to register as a Democrat and vote for Gore and then root for Gore.

ANDELMAN: Interesting. How old are you, John?

AMATO: I just turned 49. But I look younger.

ANDELMAN: We’ve spoken on the phone the last couple of days, and we’ve had some emails back and forth, my sense is that the Web site is all-consuming.

AMATO: Yes, it’s safe to say. I don’t know if I’m a workaholic, but I do believe that if you are going to do something, you do it the best you can, and then whatever happens after that happens. And it turned out when I first started blogging, I didn’t even know how to use the software, right, because it’s all new. I had like a different name. I just put up something on blogspot, and I just started playing around with what would something look like if I even hit publish, because, again, this is all very new. How many years has it been out? How many years have people been actually publishing and posting and blogging? So it started out, I’m going to start doing this, and I went a little slow. I still didn’t even know how to use the software that well, but when I finally came up with the idea of how to put video and multi-media on the Web site, I had a feeling that that would be important, and so then I came up with the name CrooksandLiars.com. I was surprised to see that the domain name was available, and I bought it, and that’s when I started to put in a little more time. I was still hurt, so I couldn’t actively do it as much. I’d do it 15 minutes and go and rest for three hours. That’s the beauty of blogging: you can do it whenever you want, because you are your own boss. Now, a couple of years later, when does the news ever stop? You wake up -- it used to be, what am I going to blog about today? Now when I wake up, it’s like, can I get everything in?

ANDELMAN: How many posts do you put up per day?

AMATO: On the average, I probably put anywhere between 12… I think I’ve had as many as 24 posts in one day.



©2007 by Bob Andelman. All rights reserved.

Labels: , , , , , , ,